Specifically, testing cosmetics on animals. Do not be stupid and do not ask "how this kind of lipstick they test on animals? What they paint a monkey and you?, / Great to me what."
Nobody will develop a formula such as lipsticks, which will be after taking toxic to human skin. Must first test all the components that are not immediately be safe.
not you ever wondered how the cosmetics, "if it gets into eyes (...)"? How do they know what happens to the eye, when he gets to it a cosmetic? I do not know about you, but I can not understand how you can accept such testing nail varnish remover on animals ...
tests look something like this:
- components are tested first on animals, forcing them to eat them, bring them with them into the bloodstream to the eye and so pour
- then test the finished cosmetic, Please imagine, someone that was incised, and then poured into the wound site to you such as hair lightener.
- nicked the animals are then killed by: twisting necks, cutting off the heads, pouring liquid nitrogen and smashing, thrown into sacks which die of themselves, or the soul, or die during the test.
- those that survive the tests, and more or less still keep are locked in cages and wait for further experiments.
Since for many people the words do not arrive, then see the pictures:
http://www.google.pl/images?hl=pl&source=imghp&biw=1280&bih=550&q=testing+on+animals&gbv=2&aq=f&aqi=&aql = & oq =
HOW TO HELP?
first Do not buy cosmetics tested on animals. If no one bought toby did not produce. Today you do not need to test cosmetics on animals, there are other methods, you have a choice.
second I would urge you to their friends.
third Forward something about tests animal using the your blog, profile photoblog or something.
HOW TO KNOW WHICH ARE Untested?
usually not tested on animals cosmetics are marked on the packaging as much as a small rabbit, with the caption "not tested on animals" or that the same thing only in Polish. Bunny is often in a triangle or a circle. It is not always the company that has become not tested, so I give below a list of cosmetics that do not have tested. But now I tell you that they are safe : Oriflame, Avon, MAC, Bielenda, Eveline, Radical, Ziaja.
I recommend you face care cosmetics with Eveline, are great! If you are using them as posted on the package is working extremely well. They do not cause side effects such as { dryness of the skin, etc.}, have a nice package, the smells and colors.
Radical - the BEST hair conditioner the world has seen.
general cosmetics not tested on animals perform better and longer. Someone once asked of me, "how do you know?". Just see for themselves the effects of their actions.
LIST OF COSMETICS untested
This list includes companies that ONLY do not test their cosmetics on animals -
http://www.peta.org/living/ beauty-and-personal-care/companies/default.aspx
The sentence "Companies That Do not Test on Animals" choose the "please choose ..." letter of the alphabet which is to start with the name of the company producing cosmetics. For example, choose the "Garnier", look what is under the category of the letter "G", looking for Garnier. If does not have some company on this list it means that the test! {\u0026lt;- this rule is not true for the Polish cosmetics companies}. And if something is on this list, it means it is good and no animal has suffered during its production. Unfortunately, you will not find on this list POLISH companies. But I know for sure that Joanna is safe {read: do not test}.
Since the list is very long because they are on {It also American companies, which does not sell its products in Poland} I think that the most reasonable you will write the most familiar names that you know or kojarzycie, on some piece of paper, so then I just take a look at this list and your recall whether the test or not.
I would add from myself that cosmetics not tested on animals perform better. How do I know? I can see their effects after use.
Additionally ever done testing milk for children on animals. Yes, milk. Rather, the chemistry that added to a meal or something. The animals were nothing but a dozen children have died, others managed to bring off. And what were these tests on animals?
Do not ask "and what the test, since no animal ?"....... because I have no power of responding. On thing for sure, if not tested on animals ksometyki arise.
One more thing: do not say that the cosmetic could be not tested, but as a component. Suppose that a component called X. This component was tested 10 years ago on animals. It was used for the production of such a cream in 2010. And what of it. As was then tested, then let them use it and not looking for new ingredients with names Y, Z, Z, etc. and the abusing new animals. On the part of krolik.net know that in the United States alone the number of animals on which tests are being carried back to 70 million. YEARLY. In the U.S. alone. Also, it is not so that your cosmetic sprinkle on one dog, only a few million animals.
0 comments:
Post a Comment